原帖由 巴风特 于 2009-8-18 10:41 PM 发表
OK，根據樓主的個人資料，email是：wongkahoo@hotmail.com
所以我根據樓主提供的email大膽地假設，樓主的名字叫wong ka hoo，嗯，應該是個很帥氣的名字。
很可惜，我在www.google.com.my搜索wong ka hoo的時候 ...
言论自由，也必须为您的言论负责
本论坛提倡言论自由，但言论自由的前提是：
1）不触犯国家的法律，
2）不威胁他人的安危，
3）不破坏他人的信誉，
4）不歧视他人的立场，*
5）不扰乱他人的生活，
6）不伤害他人的尊严。
在本论坛，请勿随意滥用言论自由，来發表辱骂丶人身攻击等不负责任言论。
言论自由是建立在受论坛版主的管制之上，
否则，如果所有言论不再受到管制的话，
那么言论自由将沦为暴力，
网民就是暴民。
别人的意见你可以不接受，别人的立场你可以不认同，
by Enther jbtalks.cc
但请学会尊重。
希望Jbtalks的各位网友，能善用站长提供给大家的这面平台，
并珍惜自己现在所拥有的发言权利。
Jbtalks管理员启
* 他人的立场，包括宗教立场，种族立场，国籍立场，政治立场，性别立场等等
https://tmhub.asianconnect.com/l ... bordinate/51607.htm
Public Prosecutor v Wong Ka Hoo
[2006] SGDC 239
close button Close
Suit No: DAC 17916/2006, 18683/2006, 24090/2006, MA 184/2006
Decision Date: 27 Oct 2006
Court: District Court
Coram: Toh Yung Cheong
Counsel: Eugene Kwang Yew Choon (Assistant Public Prosecutor) for the prosecution, Ramesh Tiwary (Ramesh Tiwary) for the accused
Judgment
27 October 2006
Judgment reserved.
District Judge Toh Yung Cheong
1 The accused, Wong Ka Hoo, pleaded guilty to one charge of importing a controlled drug into Singapore under s.7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act (Cap 185) (“MDA”) and two charges of trafficking in a controlled drug under s.5(1)(a) of the Act. The charges state:
DAC 17916/2006
You, Wong Ka Hoo, are charged that you, on the 28th day of April 2006, at or about 9.00pm, at Woodlands Checkpoint, Singapore, did import a controlled drug specified in Class A in The First Schedule to the Misuse of Drugs Act, Cap 185, as well as a specified drug listed in the Fourth Schedule to the same Act, to wit, thirty tablets weighing 8.84 grams, which were analysed and found to contain 4.92 grams of Ketamine, without any authorisation under the said Act or the Regulations made thereunder and you have thereby committed an offence under Section 7 and punishable under section 33 of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
DAC 18683/2006
You, Wong Ka Hoo, are charged that you, on the 28th day of April 2006, at sometime between 11.30pm to midnight, at the vicinity of Block 19 Balam Road, Singapore, did traffic in a controlled drug specified in Class A in The First Schedule to the Misuse of Drugs Act, Cap 185, as well as a specified drug listed in the Fourth Schedule to the same Act, to wit, by selling not less than six tablets weighing 1.73 grams which were analysed and found to contain 0.93 grams of Ketamine to one Tan Soon Hin, for a sum of $240/-, without any authorisation under the said Act or the Regulations made thereunder and you have thereby committed an offence under Section 5(1)(a) and punishable under section 33 of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
DAC 24090/2006
You, Wong Ka Hoo, are charged that you, on the 26th day of April 2006, at about almost midnight, at Lavender MRT, Singapore, did traffic in a controlled drug specified in Class A in The First Schedule to the Misuse of Drugs Act, Cap 185, as well as a specified drug listed in the Fourth Schedule to the same Act, to wit, by selling eight red tablets weighing 2.13 grams which were analysed and found to contain 1.16 grams of Ketamine to one male, Thong Yew Meng, for a sum of $240/-, at the aforesaid place without any authorisation under the said Act or the Regulations made thereunder and you have thereby committed an offence under Section 5(1)(a) and punishable under section 33 of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
2 In addition, he consented to having five charges under s.5(1)(a) MDA and one charge under s.7 MDA taken into consideration for the purpose of sentencing.
3 After convicting the accused on the charge and hearing the plea in mitigation, I sentenced the accused to the mandatory minimum sentence. As the accused has appealed against the sentence imposed, I am now setting out the reasons for my decision.
Facts
4 The accused admitted to the statement of facts without qualification. The statement of facts state that he had committed the offences of trafficking and importation of a controlled drug.
First charge: DAC 17916/2006
5 On 28 April 2006 at or about 9pm, the accused drove a car registered in Malaysia into Singapore through the Woodlands checkpoint with 30 tablets which contained 4.92 grams of Ketamine. The accused admitted to ownership of these tablets when he was later arrested.
Second charge: DAC 18683/2006
6 On 28 April 2006, between 11.30pm to midnight, in the vicinity of Balam Road, the accused sold six tablets containing 0.93 grams of Ketamine to one Tan Soon Hin for $240.
Third charge: DAC 24090/2006
7 On 26 April 2006, two days earlier, at around midnight at Lavender MRT station, the accused sold 8 tablets containing 1.16 grams of Ketamine to one Thong Yew Meng for $240.
Prescribed Punishment
8 On 1 March 2006, by virtue of the Misuse of Drugs (Amendment) Act 2006 (No.2 of 2006), Ketamine was designated a class A controlled drug listed in the First Schedule to the Misuse of Drugs Act as well as a specified drug listed in the fourth schedule of the Act. Prior to 1 March 2006, it was designated as a class B controlled drug.
9 As Ketamine is a class A controlled drug, the offences of importation and trafficking of Ketamine carry a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years imprisonment and 5 strokes of the cane.
Antecedents
10 The accused has no previous convictions.
Mitigation
11 A written plea in mitigation was submitted by the accused’s counsel. It stated that the accused was 26 years old, single, and a Malaysian who lives and works in Malaysia. He is an only child and is supporting his parents.
12 In respect of the offences, the accused claimed that the drugs were sold only to people he knew, namely his lover and a friend. In addition, it was the accused’s co-operation with the authorities that led to additional charges being tendered against him.
My decision
13 The accused was a Malaysian citizen residing and working in Malaysia. Yet he consciously decided to bring drugs into Singapore in order to sell them. The fact that he sold them to people he knew was not a mitigating factor.
14 After careful consideration, I was of the view that the mandatory minimum sentence would be appropriate and I sentenced the accused to five years imprisonment and five strokes of the cane in respect of each charge. In view of section 18 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), I ordered two of the sentences to run consecutively for a total sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. I also ordered the sentence backdated to the date the accused was first remanded.
15 At the time of preparing this judgment, the accused is serving his sentence.
原帖由 巴风特 于 2009-8-18 10:41 PM 发表
OK，根據樓主的個人資料，email是：wongkahoo@hotmail.com
所以我根據樓主提供的email大膽地假設，樓主的名字叫wong ka hoo，嗯，應該是個很帥氣的名字。
很可惜，我在www.google.com.my搜索wong ka hoo的時候 ...
原帖由 medusa 于 2009-8-19 11:17 AM 发表
巴风特先生。。。请看看日期是2006年。。。
再看看入狱多少年。。。如果真的是他。。。
现在应该和mas selamat一样有名了。。。
不过新加坡的网络那么发达。。。
可能监狱里有网络设备。。。
不 ...
原帖由 巴风特 于 2009-8-18 10:41 PM 发表
OK，根據樓主的個人資料，email是：wongkahoo@hotmail.com
所以我根據樓主提供的email大膽地假設，樓主的名字叫wong ka hoo，嗯，應該是個很帥氣的名字。
很可惜，我在www.google.com.my搜索wong ka hoo的時候 ...
原帖由 LWT1 于 2009-8-27 08:40 PM 发表
楼主羡慕我们学校是吗？？是就讲啦！！
那么想诋毁宽中的校誉，宽中生就不是人啊？！
宽中生就不会犯错啊？！讲到宽中的学生一定要十全十美那样。。。
也难怪楼主啦，也许楼主的学校太差，所以楼主想读宽中， ...
原帖由 lonelyguy 于 2009-9-5 08:40 PM 发表
督学给人的感觉
就是很幼稚
为什么动不动就拿什么'百年名校'之类的东西
一直在说新山宽柔中学的不好
那么你有看到那一群成绩好的人的表现吗??
根本就是在鸡蛋里挑骨头!!
幼稚到发神经!!
| 欢迎光临 JBTALKS.CC (https://jbtalks.my/) | Powered by Discuz! X2.5 |
