Facebook Sharer
选择您要替换的背景颜色:
【农历新年】背景图片:
个性化设定
 注册  找回密码
查看: 786|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大家忘記了還有一個 125 億的舞弊案

[复制链接]

190

主题

0

好友

2605

积分

白金长老

Rank: 10

跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2016-4-10 04:04 PM |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
http://www.themalaymailonline.co ... prosecution-failure

DAP MP demands AG’s head over PKFZ prosecution failure

KUALA LUMPUR, Jan 14 — Attorney-General (AG) Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail should be sacked for letting slip those his office deemed responsible for the government’s RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) project failure, DAP’s Tony Pua said today.

The Petaling Jaya Utara MP blamed Abdul Gani for the acquittal of two former transport ministers, Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik and most recently Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy, suggesting that their release was due to the faulty charges raised by the public prosecutor.

“Why did the Attorney-General not charge Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy for criminal breach of trust despite the PAC recommendations?” Pua asked in his statement.

A member of the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee (PAC), the DAP lawmaker said the panel had strongly recommended in November 2009 that Chan be charged with criminal breach of trust (CBT) for issuing three letters of guarantee on behalf of the government for the construction of the shipping hub, without the approval from the Finance Ministry.

He noted that PAC had consulted Abdul Gani, who had told them that the three support letters issued by Chan were implicitly a form of guarantee from the government, but added that the AG had later decided against pressing CBT charges on Chan, choosing instead a “mind-boggling charge of having cheated the then Prime Minister, Tun Abdullah Badawi”.

He argued the cheating charge was doomed to fail after the High Court ruled last year to acquit Dr Ling, who was the transport minister before Chan, and had been similarly charged with cheating Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Abdullah’s predecessor.

“Once again, the question needs to be asked: did the AG frame the charges [to] fail against both Tun Ling Liong Sik and Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy?” Pua said.

He further questioned if the AG had deliberately chosen to press “flimsy charges” against the two MCA leaders “so as to provide the Najib administration with the appearance of taking a strong stand against corruption before elections”.

The DAP national publicity secretary demanded Datuk Seri Najib Razak replace Abbdul Gani with someone competent and who could act without fear and favour, if the sixth prime minister were serious about tackling corruption within his administration.

Chan’s acquittal yesterday came after the prosecution withdrew its case against the former transport minister over the charges of fraud involving the PKFZ.

According to Chan’s lawyer, Datuk Tan Hock Chuan, the prosecution decided to drop the charges after considering his client’s application to strike out the case.

Last October, former MCA president Dr Ling was also acquitted of cheating charges over the purchase of land for the PKFZ.

The prosecution had then declined to appeal his acquittal.

Dr Ling had pitched the idea for the PKFZ in 1997, when he was then transport minister.

It was originally to have cost RM1.1 billion but the sum later grew to RM4.6 billion in 2007, before an audit by accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in 2008 showed that the total cost, including interest payments, was projected to hit RM12.5 billion.

With Chan’s acquittal yesterday, the only people who remain on trial over the scandal are former Port Klang Authority (PKA) general manager OC Phang, KDSB chief executive Steven Abok, and architect Bernard Tan Seng Swee.

===========================================

以前:
DAP: 請開除 Abdul Gani Patail !! 請定林良實的罪!!爲什麼放過 125 億!!

現在:
DAP:爲什麼開除 Abdul Gani Patail ?!林良實值得尊敬!!26億!26億!26億!(125億?什麼來的?可以吃的嗎?)






收藏收藏0

95

主题

190

好友

11万

积分

本站精忠 MVP

@@ 毒舌老許 @@

Rank: 20Rank: 20

2#
发表于 2016-4-11 03:14 AM |只看该作者
马来西亚的司法是假的,到头来什么都查不出!


回复

使用道具 举报

569

主题

140

好友

6万

积分

本站精忠 MVP

Rank: 20Rank: 20

3#
发表于 2016-4-10 09:40 PM |只看该作者
就算记得又能怎样???


回复

使用道具 举报

14

主题

4

好友

2565

积分

白金长老

Rank: 10

4#
发表于 2016-4-10 09:58 PM |只看该作者
问题的本质很简单。 公民意识不足。 或许有不少(其实还是蛮小)的第三势力一直扮演监督角色,重点是这个第三势力太渺小。


回复

使用道具 举报

aabbc123390 该用户已被禁止
5#
发表于 2016-4-24 01:45 PM |只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复

使用道具 举报

Touch_English 该用户已被禁止
6#
发表于 2016-5-3 05:20 PM |只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复

使用道具 举报

81

主题

10

好友

1105

积分

黄金长老

Rank: 8Rank: 8Rank: 8Rank: 8Rank: 8Rank: 8Rank: 8Rank: 8

7#
发表于 2016-6-17 04:12 PM |只看该作者
aabbc123390 发表于 2016-4-24 01:45 PM
法律永遠是最公正的

法律是用钱衡量公正的。


回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

JBTALKS.CC |联系我们 |隐私政策 |Share

GMT+8, 2025-1-21 12:08 PM , Processed in 0.130931 second(s), 24 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X2.5

© 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

Ultra High-performance Dedicated Server powered by iCore Technology Sdn. Bhd.
Domain Registration | Web Hosting | Email Hosting | Forum Hosting | ECShop Hosting | Dedicated Server | Colocation Services
本论坛言论纯属发表者个人意见,与本论坛立场无关
Copyright © 2003-2012 JBTALKS.CC All Rights Reserved
合作联盟网站:
JBTALKS 马来西亚中文论坛 | JBTALKS我的空间 | ICORE TECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD.
回顶部