哈迪收9千萬誹謗案：英法庭判砂拉越報告賠償15萬

JowY

The London High Court has ordered Sarawak Report to pay 28,900 (RM156,017) in costs in its case against PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang

https://www.thestar.com.my/news/ ... ay-rm156017-to-pas/

哈迪再獲得勝利

砂拉越報告應該沒有花樣玩了，接下來我們就坐等看所謂的證據在哪裡

你們覺得呢？

sung11

是吗，砂报告否认这个消息！

melodyc

haizz，这时候什么样的新闻都 有的咯

JowY

sung11 发表于 2018-5-1 10:09 PM
是吗，砂报告否认这个消息！

否認賠償 15萬嗎？

沒有哦，確確實實賠錢了

sung11

JowY 发表于 2018-5-2 10:37 AM
否認賠償 15萬嗎？

沒有哦，確確實實賠錢了

亲锅阵报纸不好信

JowY

sung11 发表于 2018-5-2 12:43 PM
亲锅阵报纸不好信

但是 SR 沒有否認啊

報道是事實啊

JowY

你們不覺得 SR 的說法很奇怪很矛盾嗎

自己有證據不寫在在抗辯書（而且還遲交，不是沒時間準備哦），現在又要更改抗辯書，現在才來講有證據？那麼是說之前講的時候都沒有啦？講了被告了才來找證據的嗎？你是法官你怎麼想？

又說什麼她的特別申請可以省錢。。她需要擔心嗎？如果哈迪敗訴，她的所有費用都是哈迪付的，她有確鑿證據根本不用擔心啊。

說什麼現在的判罰和案子無關。。你知道為什麼嗎？因為她的申請就是要法庭偏離案子，延伸去其他不相關的東西來否決哈迪的案子，這個和林神貪污案案中案的概念是一樣的，被告不提出證據證明清白卻跑去搞什麼違憲，拖時間不進入正題，能怪人家嗎？是你自己要偏離的！案中案輸了就講人家 Misleading? 現在誰在 Misleading 法庭啊？！

我覺得很好笑咯

JowY

哈迪正式文告：

PRESS STATEMENT
1 May 2018,
Terengganu, Malaysia


(1) DATO SERI TUAN GURU ABDUL HADI AWANG DEFAMATION ACTION – COURT STRIKES OUT SARAWAK REPORT ‘TRUTH’ DEFENCE AND DEFENDANT ABANDONS APPLICATION TO AMEND DEFENCE;

(2) COURT ORDERS CLARE REWCASTLE-BROWN TO PAY £41,400 TOWARDS DATO SERI TUAN GURU ABDUL HADI AWANG’S LEGAL COSTS
Following a 4-hour hearing before Mr Justice Dingemans in the High Court in London on the 30 April 2018, the Court has formally struck out the entirety of the Defendant, Clare Rewcastle-Brown’s, plea of “truth” (in other words, her case that the publication which Dato Seri Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang is suing over was substantially true).

In addition, the Defendant (Clare Rewcastle Brown) has formally abandoned her application to amend her “truth” defence to rely on an audio recording of statements allegedly made by Ustaz Nik Abduh, a national committee member of PAS and former MP for Pasir Mas constituency. The Defendant has now indicated that she intends to try to put forward yet another draft defence relying on the recording – which would be her third attempt at a “truth” defence.

The Judge also refused the Defendant’s belated attempt to ask the Court to order that there be a separate trial on the question of whether readers of Sarawak Report would have understood the article complained of to refer to Dato Seri Tuan Guru. Tuan Guru’s legal team opposed that suggestion, which Tuan Guru saw as little more than an attempt by the Defendant to put off bringing the real issues in the case to trial.

The Defendant was also forced to abandon her attempt to strike out Tuan Guru’s claim on the question of reference.

These very positive developments reflect a remarkable capitulation by the Defendant, reflected in the fact that the Judge ordered her to pay £41,400 towards Tuan Guru’s legal costs, which she will have to pay within 14 days.

Tuan Guru is pleased to note that, in light of the delays in the progress of the case, the Judge has today taken hold of the management of the case and has set out a firm timetable, leading to a trial which is likely to take place in early April 2019.

DR. AHMAD SAMSURI MOKHTAR
Political Secretary to Dato Seri Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang